MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417043070 · doi:10.3389/freae.2025.1644521

Epigenetic profiling of preterm birth: a dual-tissue methylation patterns using long-read sequencing

2025· article· en· W4417043070 on OpenAlexaff
BalaSubramani Gattu Linga, F. Ibrahim, Aleem Razzaq, Muthanna Samara, Jameela Roshanuddin, Hind H. Adi, Aseel Al-Dewik, Ayla J. Ahmedoglu, M. Walid Qoronfleh, Hatem Zayed, Duaa Elshiekh, Mona Ellaithi, Mohamed Alsharshani, Palli Valapila Abdulrouf, Thomas J. Farrell, Bader Kurdi, Ghassan Abdoh, Hilal Al Rifai, Nader Al‐Dewik

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Epigenetics and Epigenomics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Health Services and Policy Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpigeneticsDNA methylationDifferentially methylated regionsCord bloodMethylationCpG siteGenePromoterdNaM

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Preterm birth (PTB), a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality, arises from complex maternal-fetal interactions with multifactorial origins. Emerging evidence suggests that epigenetic dysregulation may mediate these interactions. This study aimed to identify DNA methylation changes associated with PTB to uncover potential biomarkers and underlying mechanisms. Methods We employed long-read sequencing to profile genome-wide DNA methylation followed by gene ontology and pathway enrichment analysis in matched maternal peripheral blood and neonatal cord blood from 15 preterm and 7 full-term deliveries (mother–infant pairs). Results A total of 1,151 significantly differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and 25,336 differentially methylated loci (DMLs) were identified across maternal and neonatal blood samples. In maternal blood from PTB cases, the most significantly hypermethylated genes were MED38 , PSMB11 , and WNT7B , whereas EXTL3 and MMP9 were among the most hypomethylated. Additionally, the promoters of VWA5A , EIF4E3 , ZNF571 , and COPB2 exhibited significant hypermethylation, while those of SIRPB1 and TNFRSF19 showed hypomethylation. In neonatal cord blood from PTB cases, the most significantly hypermethylated genes were LOC401478 , ISG20 , LMTK3 , TCAF2 , and COL4A2 , whereas EXTL3 and MMP9 were among the most hypomethylated. Promoters of DKK3 , CELF2 , and IFI35 were notably hypermethylated, whereas ALOX12 and CLBA1 were among the most hypomethylated. Enrichment analysis revealed that these epigenetic alterations impact critical developmental, immune, and neuroendocrine pathways, including Wnt signaling, calcium signaling, MAPK, oxytocin signaling, and neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction. Comparative analysis identified 120 overlapping DMLs, with 91 hypermethylated and 28 hypomethylated consistently across maternal and neonatal samples, including DPPA3 , ABCA1 , and GKN1 . In contrast, 20,240 and 4,770 DMLs were unique to cord and peripheral blood, respectively. Additionally, 14 overlapping DMRs were mapped to genes such as PLD5 , FBXO40 , GMNC , HHIP , CLEC18B , and LHX1 , exhibiting non-random chromosomal clustering. Enrichment analysis of these shared DMRs revealed significant involvement in developmental processes, including skeletal morphogenesis, axis patterning, and fibroblast growth factor signaling, indicating convergence on core regulatory pathways in PTB. Conclusion This is the first dual-tissue PTB study using long-read methylation profiling. Our results reveal distinct and shared epigenetic signatures in maternal and neonatal compartments, offering insights into the molecular etiology of PTB and potential biomarkers for early detection and therapeutic intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Epigenetics and Epigenomics→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→