MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417043242 · doi:10.1093/ageing/afaf318.173

Home & Away: Demographics And “Time Spent At Home” Of Those Attending Community Specialist Teams For Older Adults, A Pilot Study

2025· article· en· W4417043242 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tomás Ó Flatharta, Niamh Martin, James Geoghegan, Fiona McCleane, Aoife Cashen, M. Memon, Dearbhla Edwards Murphy, Kevin Kitt, Robert Murphy, Maria Costello, Michelle Canavan

Bibliographic record

VenueAge and Ageing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolypharmacyDemographicsCohortPopulationPsychological interventionEmergency departmentMultidisciplinary approachCognitive impairmentGeriatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Older people value time spent at home. The Integrated Care Programme for Older People (ICPOP) model provides specialist multidisciplinary interventions to maintain independence at home (Harnett et al., 2023). Understanding the demographics of this population and their outcomes is key to improved service planning and delivery. Decreased Time Spent at Home (TSAH) associated with Unscheduled Events (UEs) is associated with worse patient-centered outcomes (Lee et al., 2019) however it is not routinely measured in ICPOP populations. Methods Retrospective pilot cohort study of the population undergoing IPCOP Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) between January 2023 and January 2024 and outcomes collected up to May 2025. Data was collected from online hospital databases and included: demographics, level of frailty, dependence, cognition and polypharmacy. The primary outcome of interest was the number of UEs including Emergency Department attendances, Pathfinder reviews, hospital/nursing home admission and death, as well as the average TSAH prior to first unscheduled event post-CGA. Results 100 older people were included. Mean age was 82.94 (+/-6.48) years, 53% (n=53) were female and 44% (n=44) lived alone. The majority were referred from primary care (84%). Median clinical frailty score was 4. Polypharmacy was common (79% taking ≥5 and 33% taking ≥ 10 medications). Median Barthel and Lawton Brody scores 19 and 4.5 respectively. 68% (n=68) had evidence of cognitive impairment (median Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score 17). 81% (n=81) had a UE. Of these19% (n=19) were admitted to a nursing home, 21% (n=21) died. Median TSAH was 320 days from CGA to first UE. Conclusion ICPOP CGA resulted in almost a year spent at home on average before a first UE, underlying the importance of CGA in preventing admissions in a frail population. Further evaluation is required to determine actual cost savings to the health service and the value older people place on this intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.765

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAge and AgeingSame topicFrailty in Older AdultsFrench-language works237,207