MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417047037 · doi:10.33112/gripla.36.3

Fate, Sexual Desire, and Narrative Motivation in Hrólfs saga kraka

2025· article· W4417047037 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Annett Krakow

Bibliographic record

VenueGripla · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoViking Society for Northern ResearchHarvard University
KeywordsNarrativeHuman sexualityWitness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Greinin fjallar um hvernig fyrirbærin örlög og girnd eru notuð sem drifkraftur frá sagnar í Hrólfs sögu kraka (elstu handritin eru frá sautjándu öld). Í dæmunum sem hér eru tekin til athugunar beinist athyglin að lokaframvindu og orsakasamhengi frásagnarinnar. Í sögunni mótast lokaframvindan af forlagahyggju þegar skýringin á ósigri Hrólfs í orrustunni reynist vera sú að hann er ekki kristinn. Hugtakið auðna er margræðara. Í sögunni virðist það merkja guðdómlegt orsakavaldandi afl sem þó er öflugra en Óðinn. Orsakasamhengi frásagnarinnar er sérlega áberandi í kaflanum um föður Hrólfs, Helga. Misheppnuð tilraun hans til að kvænast Ólǫfu hefur keðjuverkandi áhrif; með því að nauðga Ólǫfu getur hann Yrsu og síðar, með Yrsu, getur hann Hrólf. Þegar upp kemst um sifjaspellin og í kjölfar aðskilnaðar Helga og Yrsu er rakin keðja orsaka og afleiðinga sem leiðir til átakanna milli Skuldar og Hrólfs í lokaorrustunni.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGriplaSame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207