MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417047210 · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116793

Socio-Demographic insights on urban building energy consumption

2025· article· en· W4417047210 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Masood Shamsaiee, Ursula Eicker

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy and Buildings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersHydro-QuébecCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada
KeywordsEnergy consumptionConsumption (sociology)Energy (signal processing)Efficient energy useUrban heat islandBuilding energy simulationUrban planning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Residential buildings are central to global decarbonization efforts, accounting for nearly 40 % of energy use and around 30 % of greenhouse gas emissions. While technological improvements–such as efficient appliances, retrofits, and demand-side management (DSM) programs–are widely promoted, heterogeneity in occupant behaviour remains a major source of consumption variability. Socio-demographic characteristics shape these behaviours, yet their influence on residential electricity use at urban scales remains insufficiently quantified. This study examines how socio-demographic factors drive long-term and short-term electricity consumption patterns across urban neighbourhoods in Québec, Canada. Using hourly electricity data linked with census-derived socio-demographic variables, the analysis proceeds in two phases. First, long-term heating-related behaviour is modelled through change-point analysis, and its associations with socio-demographic attributes are quantified using XGBoost regression with SHAP interpretation. Second, short-term behavioural patterns are assessed by clustering daily load profiles and predicting cluster membership through an XGBoost classification model, again interpreted using SHAP. Results show that income, household size, age structure, employment levels, and housing characteristics significantly influence both structural heating behaviour and daily load shapes. Higher-income and more densely occupied areas display elevated base loads and steeper heating slopes, while lower-income neighbourhoods exhibit earlier heating activation, suggesting reduced efficiency or comfort constraints. Daily load variability is strongly shaped by mobility and work routines: car-dependent and full-time working populations show pronounced morning and evening peaks, whereas neighbourhoods with higher unemployment or walkability exhibit flatter profiles. Aging populations and smaller households sustain higher per-capita use, likely due to longer occupancy durations and comfort-driven heating practices. These findings demonstrate that electricity demand is shaped not only by building attributes but by socio-economic realities and behavioural norms. Embedding socio-demographic diversity into urban energy models provides actionable insights for targeted retrofits, behaviour-sensitive DSM initiatives, and equitable energy policy design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy and BuildingsSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207