Portfolio Diversification with Non-Conventional Assets: A Comparative Analysis of Bitcoin, FinTech, and Green Bonds Across Global Markets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the diversification and hedging potential of non-conventional assets like cryptocurrency (Bitcoin), FinTech equities (FINXs), and green bonds (QGREENs) against traditional equity benchmarks, namely the MSCI World and MSCI Emerging Markets indices using daily data from 2016 to 2021. Employing Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregression (TVP-VAR), network connectedness analysis, and the Minimum Connectedness Portfolio (MCoP) approach, the study uncovers dynamic interdependencies among these markets. The results reveal that Bitcoin consistently acts as a net receiver of shocks, providing strong diversification benefits during crisis periods, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. FinTech assets show moderate resilience, while green bonds primarily serve as shock transmitters with limited hedging ability. Optimal portfolio weights indicate the highest allocation to Bitcoin, followed by FinTech and green assets, supporting their inclusion in diversified portfolios. Overall, the findings underscore Bitcoin’s superior risk-mitigating role and highlight the strategic importance of digital assets in achieving portfolio stability and sustainability in volatile global markets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".