MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417054177 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0337833

Impact of pregabalin reclassification as a controlled substance in Egypt on gabapentinoid and opioid utilization: A repeated cross-sectional study

2025· article· en· W4417054177 on OpenAlexaff
Araniy Santhireswaran, Shanzeh Chaudhry, Yilei Liu, Katie J. Suda, Omneya Mohamed, Mohamed Ezzat Khamis Amin, Jason R. Guertin, Mina Tadrous

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalThe Quebec Population Health Research NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregabalinGabapentinOpioidUnintended consequencesDrugAnalgesicMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Pregabalin is commonly used for treating pain but is also recognized for its misuse potential. In response to rising abuse, Egyptian health authorities reclassified pregabalin as a controlled substance in August 2019, aiming to curb misuse and regulate its distribution. This study evaluated the impact of the 2019 policy on gabapentinoid (pregabalin and gabapentin) and opioid sales in Egypt. METHODS: An interrupted time-series analysis using Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models was conducted on IQVIA MIDAS® quarterly volume sales data obtained under license from IQVIA for the period 2012-2023. Copyright IQVIA. All rights reserved. Drug volume sales were standardized per 1,000 individuals based on population estimates. ARIMA modelling was used to capture immediate and delayed effects of the August 2019 policy change. Percent changes for 3-, 6- and 12-months were also calculated. RESULTS: Overall gabapentinoid sales increased steadily until the second quarter of 2019. Following reclassification, a significant decline in total gabapentinoid sales (-67%) was observed, driven by a 99% drop in pregabalin sales, while gabapentin sales surged by 198%. ARIMA analyses of gabapentinoid sales showed a significant short-term effect (pulse: p < 0.001) and a notable gradual long-term change (ramp: p = 0.008). In contrast, opioids exhibited a significant short-term sustained increase (step: p = 0.010) but a non-significant gradual long-term change (ramp: p = 0.256), with sales rising by up to 49.5% at one year post-policy. CONCLUSIONS: Reclassifying pregabalin effectively reduced its utilization but prompted a shift to gabapentin use. Our findings highlight the complexity of drug policy interventions, underscoring the need for continuous monitoring to mitigate unintended substitution effects and better understand policy impacts of the treatment of pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment→French-language works237,207→