Enhanced Image Annotation in Wild Blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.) Fields Using Sequential Zero-Shot Detection and Segmentation Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research addresses the critical need for efficient image annotation in precision agriculture, using the wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.) cropping system as a representative application to enable data-driven crop management. Tasks such as automated berry ripeness detection, plant disease identification, plant growth stage monitoring, and weed detection rely on extensive annotated datasets. However, manual annotation is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and impractical for large-scale agricultural systems. To address this challenge, this study evaluates an automated annotation pipeline that integrates zero-shot detection models from two frameworks (Grounding DINO and YOLO-World) with the Segment Anything Model version 2 (SAM2). The models were tested on detecting and segmenting ripe wild blueberries, developmental wild blueberry buds, hair fescue (Festuca filiformis Pourr.), and red leaf disease (Exobasidium vaccinii). Grounding DINO consistently outperformed YOLO-World, with its Swin-T achieving mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) scores of 0.694 ± 0.175 for fescue grass and 0.905 ± 0.114 for red leaf disease when paired with SAM2-Large. For ripe wild blueberry detection, Swin-B with SAM2-Small achieved the highest performance (mIoU of 0.738 ± 0.189). Whereas for wild blueberry buds, Swin-B with SAM2-Large yielded the highest performance (0.751 ± 0.154). Processing times were also evaluated, with SAM2-Tiny, Small, and Base demonstrating the shortest durations when paired with Swin-T (0.30–0.33 s) and Swin-B (0.35–0.38 s). SAM2-Large, despite higher segmentation accuracy, had significantly longer processing times (significance level α = 0.05), making it less practical for real-time applications. This research offers a scalable solution for rapid, accurate annotation of agricultural images, improving targeted crop management. Future research should optimize these models for different cropping systems, such as orchard-based agriculture, row crops, and greenhouse farming, and expand their application to diverse crops to validate their generalizability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".