MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417055274 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555925

PHANGS-JWST: The largest extragalactic molecular cloud catalog traced by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emission

2025· article· en· W4417055274 on OpenAlexaff
Zein Bazzi, D. Colombo, F. Bigiel, A.K. Leroy, E. Rosolowsky, Karin Sandström, A. Duarte-Cabral, Helena Faustino Vieira, Masato I. N. Kobayashi, Hao He, Sharon E. Meidt, Ashley T. Barnes, Ralf S. Klessen, Simon C. O. Glover, Mallory Thorp, Hsi-An Pan, Ryan Chown, Rowan J. Smith, Daniel A. Dale, Thomas G. Williams, Amirnezam Amiri, J. Chastenet, Sumit K. Sarbadhicary, Annie Hughes, J.C. Lee, Lindsey Hands

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMolecular cloudGalaxyPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonSpiral galaxyStar formationInterstellar cloudSpectral lineEmission spectrum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-resolution JWST images of nearby spiral galaxies reveal polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) structures that potentially trace molecular clouds, even CO-dark regions. For this paper, we identified ISM cloud structures in PHANGS-JWST 7.7 μm PAH emission maps for 66 galaxies, smoothed to a common physical resolution of 30 pc and at native resolution. We extracted 108 466 cloud structures in the 30 pc sample and 146 040 clouds in the native resolution sample. We then calculated their molecular properties following a linear conversion from PAH to CO. Given the tendency for clouds in galaxy centers to overlap in velocity space, we opted to flag these clouds and omit them from the analysis in this work. The remaining clouds correspond to giant molecular clouds, such as those detected in CO(2 − 1) emission by ALMA, or lower surface density clouds that either fall below the ALMA detection limits of existing maps or genuinely have no molecular counterpart. We specifically used the homogenized sample for our analysis. Upon cross-matching the PAH clouds to the ALMA CO clouds at a homogenized resolution of 90 pc in 27 galaxies, we find that 41% of the PAH clouds are associated with a CO counterpart. We also show that the converted molecular cloud properties of the PAH clouds do not differ much when compared in different galactic environments. However, outside the central environment, the highest molecular mass surface density clouds are preferentially found in spiral arms. We further apply a lognormal fit to the mass spectra to an unprecedented extragalactic completeness limit of 2 × 10 3 M ⊙ , and find that spiral arms contain the most massive clouds compared to other galactic environments. Our findings support the idea that spiral arm gravitational potentials foster the formation of high surface density clouds, and that lower surface density clouds form in the interarm regions. The cloud Σ mol values show a decline of a factor of ∼1.5 − 2 toward the outer 2 − 3 R e . However, the trend largely varies in individual galaxies, with flat, decreasing, and even no trend as a function of R gal . Factors such as large-scale processes, galaxy types, and morphologies might influence the observed trends. We note that combining homogenized molecular properties of individual galaxies leads to the loss of information about the physical processes that are driving deviations in trends of those properties across different galactic environments. We published two catalogs at the CDS, one at the common resolution of 30 pc and another at the native resolution. We expect them to have broad utility for future studies of PAH clouds, molecular clouds, and star formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→