MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417056802 · doi:10.3390/metabo15120783

Untargeted Metabolomics Reveals Distinct Soil Metabolic Profiles Across Land Management Practices

2025· article· en· W4417056802 on OpenAlexaff
Zane Vickery, Hector F. Castro, Stephen P. Dearth, Eric D. Tague, Aimée T. Classen, Jessica A. M. Moore, Michael S. Strickland, Shawn R. Campagna

Bibliographic record

VenueMetabolites · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsIONICS Mass Spectrometry (Canada)
FundersBiological and Environmental ResearchOffice of ScienceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsMetabolomicsSoil waterMetabolomePastureSoil microbiologyMetabolic pathwaySoil organic matterSoil testSoil classification

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Land management practices strongly influence soil biochemical processes, yet conventional soil measurements often overlook dynamic small-molecule variation underlying nutrient cycling and microbial activity. This study aimed to evaluate whether MS1-based untargeted metabolomics can resolve meaningful biochemical differences among soil systems under distinct land management practices. Methods: Soils from six land-use types—conventional cultivation, organic cultivation, pasture, white pine, tulip poplar, and hardwood forest—were analyzed using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS). Multivariate analyses, including PLS-DA, were performed to evaluate metabolic variation across systems. Both identified metabolites and unknown spectral features (MSI Level 4) were assessed, and biosynthetic class assignment of unknown features was performed using NPClassifier. Results: Metabolic features revealed clear separation between land management systems, demonstrating distinct chemical fingerprints across ecosystems. While conventional elemental ratios (e.g., C/N) showed minimal differentiation, phosphorus-related stoichiometric ratios (C/P and N/P) displayed strong land-use-dependent differences. NPClassifier superclasses highlighted unique chemical patterns, with forest soils enriched in diverse secondary metabolites, cultivated soils characterized by simplified profiles, and pasture soils dominated by microbial membrane lipids and alkaloids. Conclusions: Untargeted MS1-based metabolomics effectively distinguished soil systems under different land-use practices and revealed ecologically meaningful variation even without complete structural identification. This study demonstrates that an MS1-only workflow leveraging unknown spectral features can robustly distinguish soil systems, underscoring their value in untargeted metabolomics analyses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMetabolitesSame topicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesFrench-language works237,207