MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417065348 · doi:10.1103/wnjh-7nwp

Neutrino and gamma-ray emissions from NGC 1068

2025· article· en· W4417065348 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Carlos Blanco, Dan Hooper, Tim Linden, Elena Pinetti

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHigh Energy PhysicsEuropean Research CouncilKavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of ChicagoSpace Telescope Science InstituteAssociation of Canadian Universities for Research in AstronomyAspen Center for PhysicsKavli FoundationOffice of ScienceNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationU.S. Department of EnergyVetenskapsrådetSwedish National Space AgencyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsActive galactic nucleusNeutrinoPionSupermassive black holeGalaxyCorona (planetary geology)Magnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IceCube has recently reported the detection of ∼ 1 – 10 TeV neutrinos from the nearby active galaxy, NGC 1068. The lack of TeV-scale emission from this source suggests that these neutrinos are generated in the dense corona that surrounds NGC 1068’s supermassive black hole. In this paper, we present a physical model for this source, including the processes of pair production, pion production, synchrotron, and inverse Compton scattering. We have also performed a new analysis of -LAT data from the direction of NGC 1068, finding that the gamma-ray emission from this source is very soft but bright at energies below ∼ 1 GeV . Our model can predict a gamma-ray spectrum that is consistent with Fermi-LAT observations when the magnetic field within the corona of this active galactic nucleus (AGN) is quite high, namely B ≳ 6 kG . To explain the observed neutrino emission, this source must accelerate protons with a total power that is comparable to its intrinsic x-ray luminosity. In this context, we consider two additional nearby active galaxies, NGC 4151 and NGC 3079, which have been identified as promising targets for IceCube.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207