MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417071198 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v14n3p125

The Effect of Intellectual Capital on Innovation and Performance of Companies Listed on B3 S/A

2022· article· W4417071198 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Flávia Lorenne Sampaio Barbosa, Fabiana Pinto de Almeida Bizarria, João Carlos Hipólito Bernardes do Nascimento, Rogeane Morais Ribeiro

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2022
Typearticle
Language
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIntellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntellectual capitalEarnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortizationExplanatory powerPath analysis (statistics)Relation (database)RevenueRelational capitalQuality (philosophy)Structural equation modeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research aims to investigate the effect of intellectual capital on innovation and performance of companies listed on B3 S/A. To this end, statistical results were analyzed for three hypotheses: IC positively influences performance (H1); IC positively influences innovation (H2); and innovation positively influences performance (H3). Based on the PLS-SEM method and the Robust Path Analysis technique, with the aid of the WARPPLS software (version 3.0), the data of 142 companies listed on B3 S/A, in the period from 2010 to 2020, in relation to the variables: degree of intagibility (intellectual capital); intangible (innovation); Tobon’s Q, Ebitda Margin, ROE and revenue growth (performance); sector, size, age and year (control variables) were tested. The adjustment results confirm the quality and explanatory power of the model, confirming the three formulated hypotheses. Thus, the analyses demonstrate the contribution of IC to innovation, as well as to the organizational performance of companies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and FinanceSame topicIntellectual Capital and Performance AnalysisFrench-language works237,207