Enhanced audio-visual speech enhancement with posterior sampling methods in recurrent variational autoencoders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recovering intelligible speech in noise is essential for robust communication. This work presents an audio-visual speech enhancement framework based on a Recurrent Variational Autoencoder (AV-RVAE), where posterior inference is extended using sampling-based methods including the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm (MALA), Langevin Dynamics EM (LDEM), Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC), Barker sampling, and a hybrid MALA+Barker variant. To isolate the contribution of visual cues, an audio-only baseline (A-RVAE) is trained and evaluated under identical data and inference conditions. Performance is assessed using Scale-Invariant Signal-to-Distortion Ratio (SI-SDR), Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ), and Short-Time Objective Intelligibility (STOI), along with anytime convergence curves (metric versus wall-clock time) and the Real-Time Factor (RTF; ratio of runtime to audio duration) to measure computational efficiency. Experimental results show that the hybrid MALA+Barker sampler achieves the best overall performance, while LDEM and step-size-optimized MALA exhibit the lowest RTFs, the MALA+Barker sampler offers the most favorable balance between efficiency and enhancement quality. Across all sampling strategies, the AV-RVAE consistently surpasses the audio-only baseline, particularly at low SNRs, confirming the benefit of visual fusion combined with advanced posterior sampling for robust speech enhancement in challenging acoustic environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".