MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417072973 · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2025.101923

Enhanced audio-visual speech enhancement with posterior sampling methods in recurrent variational autoencoders

2025· article· en· W4417072973 on OpenAlexafffund
Zohre Foroushi, Richard M. Dansereau

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Speech & Language · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpeech enhancementInferenceIntelligibility (philosophy)Sampling (signal processing)AutoencoderPattern recognition (psychology)Noise reductionPosterior probability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recovering intelligible speech in noise is essential for robust communication. This work presents an audio-visual speech enhancement framework based on a Recurrent Variational Autoencoder (AV-RVAE), where posterior inference is extended using sampling-based methods including the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm (MALA), Langevin Dynamics EM (LDEM), Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC), Barker sampling, and a hybrid MALA+Barker variant. To isolate the contribution of visual cues, an audio-only baseline (A-RVAE) is trained and evaluated under identical data and inference conditions. Performance is assessed using Scale-Invariant Signal-to-Distortion Ratio (SI-SDR), Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ), and Short-Time Objective Intelligibility (STOI), along with anytime convergence curves (metric versus wall-clock time) and the Real-Time Factor (RTF; ratio of runtime to audio duration) to measure computational efficiency. Experimental results show that the hybrid MALA+Barker sampler achieves the best overall performance, while LDEM and step-size-optimized MALA exhibit the lowest RTFs, the MALA+Barker sampler offers the most favorable balance between efficiency and enhancement quality. Across all sampling strategies, the AV-RVAE consistently surpasses the audio-only baseline, particularly at low SNRs, confirming the benefit of visual fusion combined with advanced posterior sampling for robust speech enhancement in challenging acoustic environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer Speech & LanguageSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207