MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417074936 · doi:10.1029/2025wr039984

Low‐Rank Geostatistical Inversion for Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Aquitard Hydraulic Parameters

2025· article· en· W4417074936 on OpenAlexaff
Chao Zhuang, Zhongxu Li, Long Yan, Rui Hu, Zhi Dou, Zhifang Zhou, Jinguo Wang, Walter A. Illman

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Resources Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Geostatistics and Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China-Yunnan Joint Fund
KeywordsHydrogeologyAquiferInversion (geology)GeostatisticsHydraulic conductivitySpatial variabilitySpatial distributionPrincipal component analysisSpatial heterogeneity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Many hydrogeological processes are intricately linked to both the spatial heterogeneity and temporal dynamics of the involved parameters. The variability in hydrogeological parameters across both space and time domains is defined as the spatiotemporal heterogeneity. This study introduces a partitioning geostatistical inversion approach to characterize the spatiotemporal heterogeneity, and further applies this methodology to the long‐term multi‐extensometer data from the second aquitard beneath Qingliang Primary School, Changzhou City, China. The Principal Component Geostatistical Approach (PCGA) is used to capture the temporal variability in the hydraulic conductivity ( K ) and specific storage ( S s ) across the three sub‐layers of the aquitard of interest. Comparative analysis reveals that models accounting for spatiotemporal heterogeneity achieve significantly higher accuracy than those considering only spatial heterogeneity. PCGA effectively captures the temporal variations in aquitard K and S s , with sub‐layer 3 dominating the temporal dynamics. Additionally, neglecting the initial delayed drainage within the aquitard leads to a notable overestimation of K . Moreover, utilizing a stage‐wise distribution of parameters as an initial guess significantly enhances inversion accuracy. The proposed methodology not only deepens the understanding of aquitard deformation but also holds broad potential for advancing the characterization of spatiotemporal heterogeneity in 4D hydrogeological modeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Resources ResearchSame topicSoil Geostatistics and MappingFrench-language works237,207