MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417075539 · doi:10.31083/jin41452

Environment and Brain Interactions: Typical Development of Learning and Memory Networks From Fetus to Age Two

2025· article· en· W4417075539 on OpenAlexaff
Gerry Leisman, Rahela Alfasi, Amedeo D’Angiulli

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Integrative Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionMemory developmentNeuroanatomyCognitive developmentLifelong learningBrain developmentChildhood memory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The early years of life show remarkable brain development and cognitive growth. During this time, the foundations for learning and memory are established, driven by the intricate interplay of various brain structures. Understanding the neuroanatomy of infant learning and retention is crucial in elucidating how these processes evolve and contribute to lifelong cognitive capabilities. Herein, we review the complex processes of brain development, learning and memory in the fetus, and during the first two years of life postpartum. Neural connections and key brain structures start to form during the fetal stage and continue after birth. We discuss how fetuses, infants, and toddlers absorb stimuli from their environment and develop learning and memory capabilities. We also provide an updated review of recent research findings in the field, presenting the latest insights into the development of learning and memory in the fetus and infants. In addition, we compare changes in learning and memory with electroencephalography findings from early childhood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Integrative NeuroscienceSame topicNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyFrench-language works237,207