MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417075689 · doi:10.15173/cjsc.v1i1.3935

Biologging

2025· article· W4417075689 on OpenAlexaff
Jared Shaftoe

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Science Communication · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Field (mathematics)Function (biology)Field research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comparative physiology as a field investigates how animals function within their environments at different levels of biological organization. Central to this goal is understanding how internal systems relate to the external context animals inhabit. An important tool for characterizing the function of physiological systems in environmental context is biologging. Biologging is a technique that uses either transmitted or stored radio signals to record physiological measurements, such as heart rate, activity, or oxygen concentration, and environmental characteristics, such as geographical location, depth/altitude, and temperature. In this infographic, the uses and considerations for using biologgers in the field are presented in a concise way to introduce high school or undergraduate students to this field of research and application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.012
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Science CommunicationSame topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsFrench-language works237,207