A nonparametric Bayesian analysis of independent and identically distributed observations of covariate-driven Poisson processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An important task in the statistical analysis of inhomogeneous point processes is to investigate the influence of a set of covariates on the point-generating mechanism. In this article, we consider the nonparametric Bayesian approach to this problem, assuming that $n$ independent and identically distributed realizations of the point pattern and the covariate random field are available. In many applications, different covariates are often vastly diverse in physical nature, resulting in anisotropic intensity functions whose variations along distinct directions occur at different smoothness levels. To model this scenario, we employ hierarchical prior distributions based on multi-bandwidth Gaussian processes. We prove that the resulting posterior distributions concentrate around the ground truth at optimal rate as $n\to\infty$, and achieve automatic adaptation to the anisotropic smoothness. Posterior inference is concretely implemented via a Metropolis-within-Gibbs Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm that incorporates a dimension-robust sampling scheme to handle the functional component of the proposed nonparametric Bayesian model. Our theoretical results are supported by extensive numerical simulation studies. Further, we present an application to the analysis of a Canadian wildfire dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.049 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".