Sustainable investment management in Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Canadian law likely requires asset managers with discretion over client funds to consider the sustainability impacts of their investment decisions, but there is little to no case law elaborating on this obligation—perhaps due to procedural barriers to litigation in this field. Managers of publicly traded collective investment schemes must disclose material information on how sustainability factors influence their investment decisions, but Canada’s provincial and territorial securities regulators have stopped short of standardizing these disclosures. Nonetheless, asset managers can draw on a wealth of commentary and soft law to harmonize their disclosure practices and adapt their investing approaches to better reflect the financial and other challenges posed by climate change and other threats to environmental sustainability. The likelihood that Canada’s federal government will make greater use of its own powers to drive financial sector action on sustainability gives asset managers reason to be proactive in this vein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it