MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417098353 · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.5727.1.7

A new psyllid genus from Taiwan, Danieliana gen. nov. (Hemiptera: Psylloidea: Psyllidae)

2025· article· W4417098353 on OpenAlexaff
Diana M. Percy

Bibliographic record

VenueZootaxa · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubfamilyGenusFaunaOld WorldHost (biology)Divergence (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new genus, Danieliana gen. nov., in the subfamily Amorphicolinae (Psyllidae) is described, and one new species is described from Taiwan, D. manmiaoyangae sp. nov. The definition of the subfamily Amorphicolinae previously based solely on Amorphicola is broadened to incorporate characteristics of the new genus not shared with Amorphicola. Amorphicola with two species from North America and Danieliana gen. nov. from Taiwan, are strongly supported grouping together in Amorphicolinae based on mitogenome data. The morphological and molecular divergence between the two genera is reflected in the placement in separate tribes within the subfamily (Amorphicolini trib. nov. and Danielianini trib. nov.). The host plant of D. manmiaoyangae sp. nov. is Caesalpinia crista (Fabaceae), and the immatures are free-living with eggs found on emerging foliage. The genus name and species name honour entomologists, Daniel Burckhardt and Man-Miao Yang, who together have contributed enormously to the knowledge of the psyllid fauna of Taiwan, as well as to a wide breadth of research that has furthered our understanding of psyllids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZootaxaSame topicPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogensFrench-language works237,207