A new psyllid genus from Taiwan, Danieliana gen. nov. (Hemiptera: Psylloidea: Psyllidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new genus, Danieliana gen. nov., in the subfamily Amorphicolinae (Psyllidae) is described, and one new species is described from Taiwan, D. manmiaoyangae sp. nov. The definition of the subfamily Amorphicolinae previously based solely on Amorphicola is broadened to incorporate characteristics of the new genus not shared with Amorphicola. Amorphicola with two species from North America and Danieliana gen. nov. from Taiwan, are strongly supported grouping together in Amorphicolinae based on mitogenome data. The morphological and molecular divergence between the two genera is reflected in the placement in separate tribes within the subfamily (Amorphicolini trib. nov. and Danielianini trib. nov.). The host plant of D. manmiaoyangae sp. nov. is Caesalpinia crista (Fabaceae), and the immatures are free-living with eggs found on emerging foliage. The genus name and species name honour entomologists, Daniel Burckhardt and Man-Miao Yang, who together have contributed enormously to the knowledge of the psyllid fauna of Taiwan, as well as to a wide breadth of research that has furthered our understanding of psyllids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".