MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417103862 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckaf180.248

444 Health care system accommodation of forcibly displaced migrants in Poland - challenges and adaptations

2025· article· en· W4417103862 on OpenAlexaff
Iwona A. Bielska, Estera Wieczorek, Natalia Petka, Konrad Pędziwiatr, Michał Wanke, Maciej Płaszewski, Viktoriia Hurochkina, Viktoriia Yanovska, Svitlana Luchik-Musiyezdova, Iwona Kowalska‐Bobko

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careAccommodationContext (archaeology)RefugeeHealthcare systemMental healthHealth professionals

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract PTH 3: Mental Health and Refugees 1, B307 (FCSH), September 3, 2025, 17:00 - 17:54 Aims The full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia led to one million individuals being forcibly displaced to Poland. The health care system represents an important place of contact with the refugee population. As such, it is critical to understand how these patients navigate through the health system and what facilitators and barriers are experienced throughout this process. Methods To address this, semi-structured interviews were conducted between October and December of 2024. Our purposive sample included 72 participants from nine large and small cities across Poland, including 30 refugees, 26 individuals in management roles (system planners, health care sector officials, leads in governmental and non-governmental organizations), and 16 individuals working in frontline roles (health care professionals, officers in governmental and non-governmental settings), representing different system areas and varied roles in the humanitarian crisis response. We analyzed the interviews in the context of the facilitators and barriers to accessing the health care system, as well as the system challenges and resulting adaptations from the perspectives of health care professionals and system planners. Results During the presentation, we will shed light on the main facilitators to accessing care that were identified by the participants. Nonetheless, barriers also persisted, including the ease of communication, the availability of medical records, and health care system differences that affected navigation through it. The participants described health care system pressures, which impacted its resilience, and the resulting adaptations. Conclusions Our research highlights areas of focus for improving access to care and alleviating the barriers. Implications for health system planners are suggested, such as the need for the continued assessment of the health status of refugees from Ukraine, the establishment of procedures and policies at the local and national levels with regular re-evaluations, and strong collaboration between all levels of government and with health care professionals and non-governmental organizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public Health→Same topicMigration, Health and Trauma→French-language works237,207→