MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417104038 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckaf180.347

556 Reducing barriers and enhancing outcomes for refugee children in Canada

2025· article· en· W4417104038 on OpenAlexaffabout
Augustine Botwe, Jessica Haight, Rebecca Gokiert, Cheryl Poth, Sophie Yohani, Astrid Velasquez

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThematic analysisRefugeeGeneral partnershipHealth careQualitative researchMental healthNarrative

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract EP2.1, e-Poster Terminal 2, September 3, 2025, 10:35 - 11:00 Background and Purpose Refugee children encounter barriers to healthcare access when resettling in Canada because of cultural disconnects and social determinants of health (SDOH), including language barriers, systemic discrimination and unstable housing. These barriers collectively hinder their ability to navigate the healthcare system. The New Canadians Health Centre (NCHC) reduces barriers by addressing the SDOH of government-assisted refugees through wraparound clinical and social services. This study explores how the NCHC’s integrated culturally safe healthcare model supports access and enhances outcomes for their children. Methods This community-engaged qualitative descriptive study was conducted in partnership with the NCHC. Researchers interviewed 26 refugee parents of children under six years old. Thematic analysis was used to explore their experiences accessing services at the NCHC and the perceived impact on their children’s health outcomes. Results Three main themes emerged: parental experiences accessing healthcare, effective healthcare practices that reduce barriers, and the impact of integrated wraparound services on child health outcomes. Parents reported that NCHC met both clinical and social needs, providing immunizations, mental health support, developmental assessments, and early childhood interventions. Four practices were identified as critical to reducing barriers: communication in the family’s first language, phone-based interpretation, an inclusive and safe environment, and streamlined appointment scheduling. Parents emphasized the value of wraparound services, tailored and holistic care that contributes to their children’s long-term health and well-being. Conclusions The NCHC contributes to reducing barriers to clinical and social services and improves outcomes for refugee children. Parents highlighted how the centre’s model contributes to advancing health equity and delivers high-quality care to vulnerable populations. The findings provide valuable insights for informing healthcare practices and shaping policies that support the unique needs of refugee children in Canada and globally. To effectively improve healthcare access, a holistic approach that combines clinical care with SDOH is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207