MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417104105 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckaf180.101

569 The New Canadians health centre: a community and principle-based refugee health in Canada

2025· article· en· W4417104105 on OpenAlexaffabout
Augustine Botwe, Astrid Velasquez, Molly Whalen‐Browne, Jessica Haight, Rebecca Gokiert

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsCanadian VIGOUR CentreUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeeThematic analysisHealth careGeneral partnershipQualitative researchPresentation (obstetrics)Social determinants of healthPsychological intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract OP 11: Determinants of Health Disease and Interventions 3, B207 (FCSH), September 3, 2025, 17:00 - 18:00 Purpose One of Canada’s major refugee resettlement cities, Edmonton, Alberta, receives thousands of newcomers annually, many of whom arrive with untreated complex health needs. Refugees often face significant barriers to accessing healthcare, including language challenges, unfamiliarity with the healthcare system, and unmet health needs. In response, the New Canadians Health Centre (NCHC) was established in 2021 as a principles-based community health centre providing interdisciplinary, culturally safe primary care to government-assisted refugees during their first two years in Canada. This presentation aims to describe the implementation of the NCHC’s innovative, principles-based model of care and how it addresses the unique health needs of refugee populations. Methods Using a community-engaged, qualitative approach, data were collected through interviews with clients and staff of the NCHC and a review of documents to evaluate the centre’s model. Thematic analysis was used to explore how the principles are guiding the NCHC operations in practice and the unique ways the centre is addressing refugee needs. Results The NCHC model is grounded in principles of social justice, equity, and inclusion. Participants shared that the centre delivers culturally safe interdisciplinary primary healthcare services to refugees, emphasizing the importance of the partnership with the patient, positive patient experiences, and integrating clinical care with social supports. The NCHC’s interdisciplinary team, including physicians, nurses, and health navigators, works collaboratively to address both medical and social determinants of health. Through its collaboration with local community, health, and social serving organizations, the centre provides supportive referrals for additional specialist and allied healthcare services. Conclusion The NCHC offers a promising example of how principles-based healthcare offered in a community setting can improve access and outcomes for refugee populations. This presentation will share lessons learned from the NCHC, offering insights for policymakers, healthcare providers, and communities seeking to establish or strengthen refugee-focused health services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0240.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207