MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417104432 · doi:10.1177/19408447251403487

Taking It to the Streets: Participatory Action Research Through Participatory Theatrical Dissemination

2025· article· en· W4417104432 on OpenAlexaff
Joe Norris, Nadia Ganesh, Kevin Hobbs, Bernadette Kahnert, Michael Martin Metz, Valerie Michaelson, Sheila O’Keefe-McCarthy

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Review of Qualitative Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParticipatory Visual Research Methods
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitizen journalismParticipatory action researchAction (physics)Order (exchange)Participatory GISAction research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mirror Theatre (MT) is a not-for-profit theatre company that has been devising participatory theatre around social issues since the early 1990s. In this chapter, we propose that because of participants’ active involvement in discussion and dramatic portrayals, MT offers an example of Playbuilding as Participatory Action Research. This article provides (a) a theoretical discussion linking playbuilding to PAR, (b) examples of current MT projects, and (c) supporting data from participants, including a rationale for an expanded definition of PAR. URLs of performances are provided and viewing is recommended in order to obtain a thick description of the performance phase in action.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.130
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.091
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.687

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1300.091
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0130.024
Scholarly communication0.0140.009
Open science0.0030.015
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.961
GPT teacher head0.854
Teacher spread0.107 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Review of Qualitative ResearchSame topicParticipatory Visual Research MethodsFrench-language works237,207