MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417104466 · doi:10.5539/elt.v19n1p10

Tragedy and Redemption: The Postcolonial Interpretation of Wide Sargasso Sea

2025· article· W4417104466 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mei Xiaoli, Ru Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish Language Teaching · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHybridityColonialismInterpretation (philosophy)IndigenousTragedy (event)Postcolonialism (international relations)Sargasso seaRace (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study applies postcolonial theory to Wide Sargasso Sea, examining the construction of Antoinette as a Creole woman marginalized by both race and gender. Drawing on the works of Bhabha, Fanon, and Spivak, the study analyzes how colonial cultural hegemony, racial hybridity and patriarchal domination produce Antoinette’s fragmented identity. Through close textual analysis, the paper explores her unstable position between English colonizers and Black communities, her silencing within patriarchal marriage and her unsuccessful attempts to secure a coherent sense of self. Ultimately, this study contends that Antoinette’s final act is a radical form of redemption—a tragic but necessary reclamation of her suppressed cultural identity. The findings contribute to postcolonial feminist readings of the novel by demonstrating how Rhys reclaims the voice of the silenced “Other” within the imperial archive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.031
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish Language TeachingSame topicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207