MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417104878 · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-25471-5

Mediating pathways between area-level deprivation and hypertension in Nepal: the role of nutritional status, food insecurity, and health behaviors

2025· article· en· W4417104878 on OpenAlexaff
Ishor Sharma, M. Karen Campbell, Yun‐Hee Choi, Isaac Luginaah, Jason Mulimba Were, Juan-Camilo Vargas-Gonzalea, Saverio Stranges

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsChildren’s Health Research InstituteLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiostatisticsPublic healthBody mass indexDiseaseContext (archaeology)Food insecurityEpidemiologyProxy (statistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a major contributor to global disease burden, and the prevalence is associated to various social determinants, including area-level deprivation. However, the mechanisms underlying this association remain unclear, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study explores how household food insecurity, individual behaviors (smoking and alcohol use), and nutritional status may mediate the relationship between area-level deprivation and hypertension in Nepal. METHODS: We used nationally representative data from the 2016 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey. Area-level deprivation was measured using a validated 15-item composite index. A two-level structural equation model was employed to analyze both the direct and indirect (mediated) relationships between deprivation and hypertension, with individuals (aged ≥ 15 years) and households nested within geographic clusters/areas. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of hypertension was 22.9%, with a higher rate in less deprived (more affluent) areas (27.5%) compared to highly deprived ones (17.9%). When mediators were not included, area-level deprivation was inversely associated with hypertension. However, when potential mediators—Body Mass Index (BMI; as a proxy for nutritional status), household food insecurity, and individual behaviors (smoking and alcohol use) were included, the direct effect of deprivation on hypertension was no longer significant. BMI emerged as the only significant mediator, accounting for approximately 70% of the total indirect effect. Food insecurity and individual behaviors did not significantly mediate the relationship; although, food insecurity was associated with lower hypertension risk and individual health behaviors (smoking and alcohol use) with higher risk at the individual level. CONCLUSION: In the context of Nepal, hypertension is more prevalent in affluent areas, and BMI- a proxy for nutritional status significantly mediates the link between area-level deprivation and hypertension risk. These findings highlight the role of nutritional transitions in LMICs and the need for context-specific public health strategies targeting both environmental and individual-level factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.341
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.090 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Public Health→Same topicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations→French-language works237,207→