MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417106875 · doi:10.29300/mjppm.v14i2.9319

Pelatihan Pemanfaatan Teknologi Drone dalam Pembuatan Video Promosi Wisata sebagai Optimalisasi Pengembangan Potensi Desa Wisata Kreatif Terong

2025· article· W4417106875 on OpenAlexaff
Dwi Rizka Zulkia, Fahri Setiawan, Padlun Fauzi, Razan Aldi Maulana, Zulvi Febriansha

Bibliographic record

VenueManhaj Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicWetland Management and Conservation
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismScope (computer science)Service (business)SustainabilitySocial mediaDroneCommunity service

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desa Wisata Kreatif Terong is beginning to be recognized by all parties as one of the pioneering tourism villages that "dares" in showing its identity, daring to introduce its local wisdom and daring to carry out new innovations to support the growth of Belitung Island tourism. However, the development of the village faces various challenges, including a lack of public understanding of tourism management and minimal access to relevant training. One of the needs for tourism village managers that must be present in tourism management is the creation of content to promote their tourism, so training is needed in the use of drone technology as an effort to optimize the development of tourism village potential packaged in the form of community service activities. This activity was attended by 20 participants consisting of members of the Tourism Awareness Group of Terong Village and Keciput Village, Sijuk District, Belitung Regency. This activity has produced several outputs, namely successfully increasing the knowledge and skills of the community in operating drones, creating a local creative team ready to play a role in creating promotional content on an ongoing basis, and strengthening the collaborative network between universities and the village government. For the sustainability of the program, it is recommended that similar training activities be carried out periodically with a wider scope of material, such as professional video editing techniques, digital marketing, and tourism social media management

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManhaj Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian MasyarakatSame topicWetland Management and ConservationFrench-language works237,207