MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

תל חצור – 2010

2010· article· W4417108154 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amnon Ben-Tor

Bibliographic record

VenueḤadašŵt ʾarkeyŵlŵgiyŵt. · 2010
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcavationFoundation (evidence)HebrewNational parkGeorge (robot)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During June-July 2010, the twenty-first season of the 'Selz Foundation Hazor Excavations in Memory of Yigael Yadin' was conducted at Tel Hazor (License No. G-12/2010). The excavation, on behalf of the Philip and Muriel Berman Center for Biblical Archaeology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the support of the Israel Exploration Society, benefited from the financial assistance of the Selz Foundation (New York), the Late Reginald David Benjamin and Esme Benjamin (Perth, Western Australia), the Edith and Reuben Hecht Fund (Israel), and individual donors. The excavation was directed by A. Ben-Tor and S. Zuckerman, with the assistance of S. Bechar (supervision, Area M), O. Harush (registration), I. Strand, D. Porotzki and V. Pirsky (surveying and drafting), O. Cohen (restoration and preservation), M. Cimadevilla (photography) and S. Yadid (administration). Participating in the excavation were students and volunteers from the USA, Canada, Europe (Russia, Germany, France, Scandinavian countries and England) and Israel. The excavation takes place in the Hazor National Park and receives full cooperation from the National Parks Authority. The expedition was housed at Qibbuz Kefar Ha-Nassi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1680.119

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueḤadašŵt ʾarkeyŵlŵgiyŵt.Same topicArchaeology and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207