Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2005-2007 and 2014-2016, a survey was conducted in the southern Golan Heights (License Nos. G-72/2005, G-71/2006, G-74/2006, G-75/2006, G-82/2007, G-84/2007, G-88/2007, S-515/2014, G-89/2015, S-611/2015, G-61/2016, G-79/2016, G-80/2016, S-673/2016; map ref. 2590-802/7324-513), for the purpose of reconstructing the settlement history in this region at the end of the Second Temple period and in the Mishnaic and Talmudic periods. The survey, performed as part of a study of the territory of Sussita in the Roman period, on behalf of Bar Ilan University and financed by the Institute of Archaeology at Bar Ilan University, Koschitzky Fund, Krauthammer Cathedra and Moskowitz Cathedra, was directed by S. Fridman (pottery reading), with the assistance of D. Adan-Bayewitz and H. Ben-David (scientific guidance), D. Amit and B. Zissu (identification of stone vessels), Y. Dray (metal detection and cleaning of coins), D.T. Ariel (numismatics), M. Eisenberg and A. Karasik (pottery drawing) and N. Katsnelson (glass). Students from the Kinneret College and Bar-Ilan University, together with pupils from the religious high school in Haspin, participated in the survey.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.080 | 0.034 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".