MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417112418 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.06289

Ultracold Neutron Guide-Coating Facility at U.Winnipeg

2025· preprint· en· W4417112418 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T. Hepworth, A. Zahra, B. Algohi, R. de Vries, S. Pankratz, Phyllis Switzer, Thomas Reimer, Mark McCrea, J. W. Martin, R. Mammei, David Anthony, L. Barrón-Palos, Michael J. Bossé, Michael P. Bradley, A. Brossard, Tung Thanh Bui, J. Chak, R. Chiba, Charles A. Davis, K. Drury, Derek Fujimoto, R. Fujitani, Michael Gericke, P. Giampa, C. Gibson, Robert Golub, Takashi Higuchi, Go Ichikawa, Ichiro Ide, Shusaku Imajo, A. Jaison, B. Jamieson, M. Katotoka, S. Kawasaki, Masaaki Kitaguchi, W. Klassen, E. Korkmaz, E. Korobkina, M. Lavvaf, Thomas Lindner, N. Lo, S. Longo, Kirk W. Madison, Y. Makida, John Malcolm, J. Mammei, Z. P. Mao, C. Marshall, R. Matsumiya, E. Miller, Meredith Miller, K. Mishima, T. Mohammadi, Takamasa Momose, Matthew M. Nalbandian, T. Okamura, Rajiv Patni, R. Picker, Ke Qiao, W. D. Ramsay, W. Rathnakela, D. Salazar, Jun Sato, Wolfgang Schreyer, T. Shima, H. M. Shimizu, S. Sidhu, Shawn Stargardter, R. Stutters, I. Tanihata, Tushar, W. T. H. van Oers, N. Yazdandoost, Q. Ye, M. Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltracold neutronsCoatingNeutronNeutron reflectometryFermi Gamma-ray Space TelescopeDeposition (geology)Neutron sourceSubstrate (aquarium)Diamond-like carbon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the construction and commissioning of a new ultracold neutron (UCN) guide-coating facility at the University of Winnipeg. The facility employs pulsed laser deposition (PLD) to produce diamond-like carbon (DLC) coatings on cylindrical UCN guides up to 1 m in length with a 200 mm outer diameter. DLC is a promising material for UCN transport and storage due to its high real component of the optical potential, low neutron absorption cross section, and low depolarization probabilities. First coating attempts on a full length aluminum UCN guide and matching blank flange were successfully coated with a carbon film with density of 2.3 g/cm 3 , corresponding to optical potentials of 200 neV, as measured by X-ray reflectometry (XRR). Coating thicknesses were measured to be 90 nm for the UCN guide and 180 nm for the flange with no evidence of delamination. The implementation of a plasma plume collimator and plasma feed back control via a time of flight in vacuum ion probe produced a film with an XRR measured density of 2.8 g/cm 3 , corresponding to an optical potential of 240 neV. This 80 nm thick film had poor adhesion to the aluminum tube substrate. These results establish a baseline for the coating facility. Ongoing and future work focuses on improving the diamond content of films and adhesion through plasma plume collimation, TOF ion probe feed back, and pre/post treatment methods with the goal of providing high quality DLC UCN guides for the TUCAN experiment at TRIUMF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArXiv.orgSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207