A Hybrid End-to-End Dual Path Convolutional Residual LSTM Model for Battery SOH Estimation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate estimation of battery state of health is essential for ensuring safety, supporting fault diagnosis, and optimizing the lifetime of electric vehicles. This study proposes a compact dual-path architecture that combines Convolutional Neural Networks with Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory (ConvLSTM) units to jointly extract spatial and temporal degradation features from charge-cycle voltage and current measurements. Residual and inter-path connections enhance gradient flow and feature fusion, while a three-channel preprocessing strategy aligns cycle lengths and isolates padded regions, improving learning stability. Operating end-to-end, the model eliminates the need for handcrafted features and does not rely on discharge data or temperature measurements, enabling practical deployment in minimally instrumented environments. The model is evaluated on the NASA battery aging dataset under two scenarios: Same-Battery Evaluation and Leave-One-Battery-Out Cross-Battery Generalization. It achieves average RMSE values of 1.26% and 2.14%, converging within 816 and 395 epochs, respectively. An ablation study demonstrates that the dual-path design, ConvLSTM units, residual shortcuts, inter-path exchange, and preprocessing pipeline each contribute to accuracy, stability, and reduced training cost. With only 4913 parameters, the architecture remains robust to variations in initial capacity, cutoff voltage, and degradation behavior. Edge deployment on an NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin confirms real-time feasibility, achieving 2.24 ms latency, 8.24 MB memory usage, and 12.9 W active power, supporting use in resource-constrained battery management systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".