MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417114338 · doi:10.3390/batteries11120449

A Hybrid End-to-End Dual Path Convolutional Residual LSTM Model for Battery SOH Estimation

2025· article· en· W4417114338 on OpenAlexaff
Azadeh Gholaminejad, Arta Mohammad‐Alikhani, Babak Nahid‐Mobarakeh

Bibliographic record

VenueBatteries · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcMaster University Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidualConvolutional neural networkBattery (electricity)Benchmark (surveying)Deep learningPreprocessorSoftware deploymentFeature (linguistics)TrippingEdge device

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate estimation of battery state of health is essential for ensuring safety, supporting fault diagnosis, and optimizing the lifetime of electric vehicles. This study proposes a compact dual-path architecture that combines Convolutional Neural Networks with Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory (ConvLSTM) units to jointly extract spatial and temporal degradation features from charge-cycle voltage and current measurements. Residual and inter-path connections enhance gradient flow and feature fusion, while a three-channel preprocessing strategy aligns cycle lengths and isolates padded regions, improving learning stability. Operating end-to-end, the model eliminates the need for handcrafted features and does not rely on discharge data or temperature measurements, enabling practical deployment in minimally instrumented environments. The model is evaluated on the NASA battery aging dataset under two scenarios: Same-Battery Evaluation and Leave-One-Battery-Out Cross-Battery Generalization. It achieves average RMSE values of 1.26% and 2.14%, converging within 816 and 395 epochs, respectively. An ablation study demonstrates that the dual-path design, ConvLSTM units, residual shortcuts, inter-path exchange, and preprocessing pipeline each contribute to accuracy, stability, and reduced training cost. With only 4913 parameters, the architecture remains robust to variations in initial capacity, cutoff voltage, and degradation behavior. Edge deployment on an NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin confirms real-time feasibility, achieving 2.24 ms latency, 8.24 MB memory usage, and 12.9 W active power, supporting use in resource-constrained battery management systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBatteriesSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207