MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417118011 · doi:10.5194/acp-25-17907-2025

Decadal changes in atmospheric ammonia and dry deposition across China inferred from space-ground measurements and model simulations

2025· article· en· W4417118011 on OpenAlexafffund
Fan Sun, Yu Cui, Jiayin Su, Mark W. Shephard, Shailesh Kumar Kharol, Yifan Zhang, Xuejing Shi, Junqing Zhang, Huili Liu, Qitao Xiao, Xiao Lu, Zhao‐Cheng Zeng, Timothy J. Griffis, Cheng Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueAtmospheric chemistry and physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province for Distinguished Young Scholars“333 Project” of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceChina Meteorological AdministrationNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEuropean Centre for Medium-Range Weather ForecastsNational Bureau of Statistics of China
KeywordsDeposition (geology)AmmoniaParticulatesEcosystemNitrogenSeasonalityPrecipitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ammonia (NH 3 ), a key alkaline gas in the atmosphere, significantly influences ecosystem nitrogen cycling and the formation of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ). However, limited ground-based monitoring hinders understanding of NH 3 's spatial and temporal dynamics and its dry deposition across China, which is ranked as one of the largest global NH 3 emission hotspots. This study integrated 2013–2023 satellite-derived NH 3 column concentrations from the Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) with adjustments from approximately five years ground in-situ ground observations to derive spatial-temporal variation in ground-level NH 3 concentrations across China. We also used the GEOS-Chem transport model and a random forest algorithm by using emission inventories and reanalysis meteorological fields to simulate NH 3 dry deposition velocity and fluxes, and explore the mechanisms driving observed trends. The CrIS observations results show that column-averaged (averages from ground to ∼ 1 km) NH 3 concentrations were the highest in the North China Plain (> 10 ppb), with notable annual and seasonal increasing trends. NH 3 concentrations in 2023 were 13.8 %–30.6 % higher than in 2013. CrIS retrievals aligned well with in-situ data, though were generally about twice as high. After applying the regression equation between ground in-situ observations and CrIS column-averaged NH 3 concentrations, we derive the spatial-temporal ground-level (1–1.5 m) NH 3 concentrations and dry deposition fluxes from 2013 to 2023. The NH 3 dry deposition fluxes exhibited a clear east-west gradient, with maxima in the North China Plain, and another hotpot region is also observed in the Sichuan Basin, southwestern China. Increases in ground-level NH 3 concentrations and deposition were most pronounced in urban, cropland, and forest regions, with urban areas experiencing the fastest growth and grasslands the highest total deposition. The national mean ground-level NH 3 concentration and dry deposition flux were 4.98 ppb and 0.51 g NH 3 m −2 yr −1 , respectively. Anthropogenic emissions explained 77.4 % of the variability in ground-level NH 3 concentration trend, and meteorological factors accounted for the remainder. Besides, 72.6 %–81.2 % of the NH 3 dry deposition trend was governed by NH 3 concentration changes. This study identifies the underlying cause of increasing ammonia pollution, which can be used to better inform nitrogen management strategies in China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtmospheric chemistry and physics→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→