MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417121925 · doi:10.3390/healthcare13243215

Impact of Polyphenol Supplementation on Energy Expenditure Measured by Indirect Calorimetry in Adolescents with Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Pilot Randomized Study

2025· article· en· W4417121925 on OpenAlexaff
Marie‐Catherine Turcotte, Véronique Bélanger, Sophia Morel, Anik Cloutier, Émile Lévy, Valérie Marcil, Ramy El Jalbout, Véronique Groleau

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyphenolEnergy expenditureRandomized controlled trialCalorimetryEnergy metabolismTriglycerideResting energy expenditure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is increasingly prevalent among adolescents, especially those with obesity. It is the leading cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality and can progress to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis, and eventually irreversible cirrhosis. There is currently no medical treatment recommended for MASLD in adolescents. Nutritional interventions, such as polyphenol supplementation, could be a non-pharmacological option to improve metabolic outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This pilot study aimed to preliminarily assess the impact of a 60-day polyphenol supplementation on measured resting energy expenditure (mREE) by indirect calorimetry (IC) in adolescents with MASLD. It also compared mREE by IC with predicted resting energy expenditure (pREE) using the WHO and Schofield formulae. METHODS: This single-blind randomized controlled trial enrolled 23 adolescents with MASLD, of which 11 completed IC assessments before and after the 60-day polyphenol supplementation (intervention group, n = 5) or no supplementation (controls, n = 6). There was no placebo. Caloric intake was assessed to evaluate its impact on mREE and mREE was compared to pREE using the WHO and Schofield equations. RESULTS: = 0.021). No significant changes were observed when adjusting mREE for body weight. Also, there were no significant changes in body weight in the two groups between the visits. Both the WHO and Schofield equations overestimated pREE with an average percentage of pREE of 88.8% and 91.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although several methodological limitations prevent clear conclusions from being drawn at this stage, this study suggests that polyphenol supplementation could increase REE in adolescents with MASLD and that the WHO and Schofield equations tend to overestimate REE in obese patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcareSame topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207