Experimental Investigations of Vibration Band Gaps in Platonic 3D Lattice Structures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vibration band gap structures are advanced materials for vibration wave mitigation from metamaterials to phononic crystals from simple geometrical manipulations. Here, we present geometrical structures, made from platonic solids, that are capable of providing multi-passband frequency ranges with face symmetry in each unit cell. We fabricated the metamaterial structures using stereolithography, after which we experimentally characterized band gaps through impulse vibration testing. Experimental results have shown that the band gaps can be changed for different types of platonic structures along with the loading direction. This provided a comparison between axial and two bending direction band gaps, revealing ranges where the structures behave in either a “fluid-like” or an “optical-like” manner. Dodecahedron unit cells have exhibited the most promising results, when compared with reduced relative densities and a number of stacking unit cells. We utilized the coherence function during signal processing analysis, which provided strong predictions for the band gap frequency ranges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it