MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Real-Time Microwave Sensing with Engineered Electromagnetic Passive Tag Coupled to UWB Antenna

2025· article· W4417131837 on OpenAlexaff
Amirhossein Yazdanicherati, Maziar ShafieiDarabi, Carolyn L. Ren, Zahra Abbasi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrowaveCoupling (piping)Antenna (radio)Frequency shiftLayer (electronics)Frequency responseRadio frequencySample (material)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study introduces a novel passive microwave sensor integrated with an ultra-wideband (UWB) coplanar antenna for real-time sensing. The passive tag consists of a twolayer structure interconnected by vias, where the bottom layer operates as a non-resonant surface, and the top layer serves as a resonator. This unique design enhances sensing performance by enabling precise manipulation of the electric field and sensing region, while also extending the operating distance by increasing the absorbance rate of the passive tag. Simulations reveal that the proposed design for small amounts of material changes achieves a frequency shift of 104 MHz and a maximum effective coupling distance of 18 mm, outperforming conventional designs with a frequency shift of 24 MHz and a coupling distance of 7 mm. Measurements on a fabricated prototype further validate its high sensitivity, with the sensor demonstrating a 2.125 MHz frequency shift when detecting a$250 \mu \mathrm{L}$sample of deionized water compared to acetone, highlighting the potential of the proposed design for biomedical scenarios requiring minimal sample quantities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207