MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

SRR-Based Disposable Microwave-Microfluidic Sensor for Assessing Liquid Carrier Influence on Microplastic Detection

2025· article· W4417132190 on OpenAlexaff
Maziar ShafieiDarabi, Amirhossein Yazdanicherati, Zahra Abbasi, Carolyn L. Ren

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTap waterMicroplasticsIrrigationSodium polyacrylateNitratePrecision agricultureSodiumSensitivity (control systems)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efficient monitoring of Microplastics (MPs) in water systems, particularly in agricultural runoff and irrigation sources, is crucial for assessing their impact on soil and crop health. This work proposed a double split-ring resonator (SRR) based microwave-microfluidic sensor that minimizes the effects of liquid carrier composition on MP detection in aqueous samples. To simulate agricultural conditions, deionized water, tap water, and solutions of urea, sodium chloride, potassium nitrate, and sodium nitrate were tested as liquid carriers. The sensor was validated using polyethylene particles in the$\mathbf{2 5 0 - 3 0 0} \boldsymbol{\mu}$m size range. Average frequency shifts of 374 kHz and 691 kHz were observed for each SRR, highlighting their high sensitivity and consistent performance across varying liquid carriers. The results demonstrated that the liquid carrier composition significantly influences sensor efficiency, which is a necessary step in adapting the sensor for real-world environmental conditions, establishing a foundation for scalable technologies to support sustainable agriculture and protect water quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution→French-language works237,207→