Artificial Intelligence and Superintelligence: The New Frontiers of Human Capability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has progressed from rule-based automation to increasingly autonomous, general-purpose systems capable of perception, reasoning, and large-scale decision-making. This rapid evolution has renewed scientific interest in the theoretical and practical conditions under which artificial systems may approach or surpass human-level cognition. This paper presents a comprehensive analytical framework that traces the historical milestones of AI, examines the conceptual boundaries between human intelligence, artificial general intelligence (AGI), and artificial superintelligence (ASI), and evaluates the technical, ethical, and existential challenges associated with highly capable AI systems. By synthesizing developments in machine learning, deep neural architectures, cognitive modeling, and alignment research, the study identifies key trajectories that may lead to future superintelligent systems and highlights the critical transition points that shape this progression. Furthermore, the paper provides a structured assessment of risks across developmental stages-from narrow AI to mature ASI-addressing issues such as value misalignment, goal divergence, capability scaling, and long-term societal impact. The proposed analysis offers a unified perspective on the future of intelligent systems and outlines the governance considerations required to ensure that advanced AI technologies evolve safely, predictably, and in alignment with human values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".