MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417133803 · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000748

“Heat is a danger to my health even though I said I am used to it”: Qualitative insights of workplace heat among community health workers and health promoters in Kenya

2025· article· en· W4417133803 on OpenAlex
Teresia Wamuyu Maina, Cynthia J. Williams, Thomas Jaenisch, Till Bärnighausen, Astrid Berner-Rodoreda, Kate Bärnighausen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePLOS Climate · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersGerman Academic Exchange Service
KeywordsExtreme weatherThematic analysisPsychological resilienceHealth careWork (physics)Qualitative researchOccupational safety and health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change is one of the most prominent environmental and health challenges of the 21st century. Variations in extreme temperature and weather events intensify occupational heat exposure and place workers at increasing risk of heat-related illness (HRIs) and injury. Healthcare workers, especially those in resource-limited, community-based, or mobile settings, face significant occupational risks from rising temperatures, yet these challenges remain largely overlooked and insufficiently studied. This qualitative study, based on semi-structured face-to-face interviews, explores the experiences of Community Health Workers (CHWs) and Community Health Promoters (CHPs) in Kenya, examining how extreme heat affects their personal health, livelihoods, and the delivery of community-based health services. We conducted 41 in-depth interviews with CHWs and CHPs (Mombasa County, n = 19; Tana River County, n = 22). Data was managed using NVivo 14 and analysed drawing on tenets of reflexive thematic analysis. We identified a pattern of intersecting vulnerabilities shaped by experiences of economic inequality, work conditions and pressures, HRIs, and challenges of accessing healthcare, effects of changing weather patterns on community health work and livelihoods, and gendered experiences of extreme weather and work challenges. Our findings show that these domains are not discrete but reinforcing, with overlapping effects that not only shape the daily experiences of CHWs and CHPs but also constrain their resilience and the effectiveness of community health service delivery. Our findings highlight the urgent need for climate-resilient health systems that not only improve the working conditions or protect CHWs and CHPs from extreme heat but also address the structural inequalities, such as economic disparities and the challenges of gendered burdens, that heighten their vulnerability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.619
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it