MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417133803 · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000748

“Heat is a danger to my health even though I said I am used to it”: Qualitative insights of workplace heat among community health workers and health promoters in Kenya

2025· article· en· W4417133803 on OpenAlexaff
Teresia Wamuyu Maina, Cynthia J. Williams, Thomas Jaenisch, Till Bärnighausen, Astrid Berner-Rodoreda, Kate Bärnighausen

Bibliographic record

VenuePLOS Climate · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersGerman Academic Exchange Service
KeywordsExtreme weatherThematic analysisPsychological resilienceHealth careWork (physics)Qualitative researchOccupational safety and health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change is one of the most prominent environmental and health challenges of the 21st century. Variations in extreme temperature and weather events intensify occupational heat exposure and place workers at increasing risk of heat-related illness (HRIs) and injury. Healthcare workers, especially those in resource-limited, community-based, or mobile settings, face significant occupational risks from rising temperatures, yet these challenges remain largely overlooked and insufficiently studied. This qualitative study, based on semi-structured face-to-face interviews, explores the experiences of Community Health Workers (CHWs) and Community Health Promoters (CHPs) in Kenya, examining how extreme heat affects their personal health, livelihoods, and the delivery of community-based health services. We conducted 41 in-depth interviews with CHWs and CHPs (Mombasa County, n = 19; Tana River County, n = 22). Data was managed using NVivo 14 and analysed drawing on tenets of reflexive thematic analysis. We identified a pattern of intersecting vulnerabilities shaped by experiences of economic inequality, work conditions and pressures, HRIs, and challenges of accessing healthcare, effects of changing weather patterns on community health work and livelihoods, and gendered experiences of extreme weather and work challenges. Our findings show that these domains are not discrete but reinforcing, with overlapping effects that not only shape the daily experiences of CHWs and CHPs but also constrain their resilience and the effectiveness of community health service delivery. Our findings highlight the urgent need for climate-resilient health systems that not only improve the working conditions or protect CHWs and CHPs from extreme heat but also address the structural inequalities, such as economic disparities and the challenges of gendered burdens, that heighten their vulnerability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.013
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLOS ClimateSame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207