MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417142266 · doi:10.55259/jiip.v32i2.314

Analisis Karakteristik dan Potensi Lahan Pekarangan untuk Mendukung Penganekaragaman Konsumsi Pangan Keluarga di Kecamatan Kepil Kabupaten Wonosobo

2025· article· W4417142266 on OpenAlexaff
Mindasa Mindasa

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYardDiversification (marketing strategy)AgricultureDominance (genetics)Food groupFood processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential of the yard contributes to food availability and diversification of food consumption. Utilization for agricultural activities will provide benefits in the form of the availability of healthy and nutritious fresh food. This study aims to analyze the characteristics and potential of yard land based on supporting the diversification of family food consumption in Kepil District. This study was conducted in Kepil District from March to June 2025. The study was conducted using a survey method, sampling with stratified random sampling. The results showed that the majority of yard land was in the narrow category with a dominance of the front zone for cultivating vegetables and spices. A total of 10 types of plants that are often found in more than 50% of yards in Kepil District are; red cayenne pepper, curly chili, spring onions, eggplant, tomatoes, celery, caisim, ginger, turmeric and lemongrass. Food diversification in Kepil District found 5 groups of fresh food from plants 5 types of cereal group food, 26 types of vegetable group food, 14 types of spice group food, 22 types of fruit group food, 1 type of freshener and sweetener group food, 1 type of poultry group food, 3 types of mammalian animal product group food, 3 types of fish group food. The pattern of utilization of food sources in the yard of Kepil District is as a source of carbohydrates 5.33%, fat 4.00%, minerals 49.33%, protein 9.33% and vitamins 32.00%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Ilmu-Ilmu PertanianSame topicFood Security and Socioeconomic DynamicsFrench-language works237,207