MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417143325 · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000005322

Rehydration After Exercise-Induced Fluid Losses: Comparing Flavored Water, Coconut Water, and Carbohydrate-Electrolyte Sports Beverage

2025· article· en· W4417143325 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCoconut Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalatabilityFluid intakeFluid replacementThirstBody fluidDehydrationVolume (thermodynamics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Bell, SK and Spriet, LL. Rehydration following exercise-induced fluid losses: comparing flavored water, coconut water, and carbohydrate-electrolyte sports beverage. J Strength Cond Res 40(4): 431-438, 2026-Effective fluid volume and electrolyte replacement after exercise is essential to rehydration and optimal athletic performance. Despite coconut water's (CW) inherently high electrolyte content, there is still limited supporting evidence on its use and rehydration efficacy. The following study investigated the rehydration efficacy and palatability of natural CW compared with flavored water (FW) and carbohydrate-electrolyte sports (CES) beverage, after exercise-induced dehydration. During this randomized, single-blind, cross-over study, 8 recreational athletes (7 men, 1 woman; 22.3 ± 0.4 years and 48.2 ± 2.2 ml min kg -1 V̇ o2 max), cycled at 70% V̇ o2 max for 60 minutes until dehydrated by 1.36 ± 0.1% (1.07 ± 0.1 kg) of initial body mass (BM). During separate trials, subjects ingested 1 of 3 electrolyte beverages: FW, CW, or CES in volumes equivalent to 150% of BM lost. Hydration status was assessed with body mass measures and urine volume collections. Perceptual measures of beverage saltiness, thirst, and nausea were recorded using a 5-point Fluid Sensation Scale. After rehydration, FW produced statistically greater total urine output (530 ± 119.2 ml) compared with CW (170 ± 35.8 ml) and CES (170 ± 35.8 ml), p < 0.05. Subjects retained the greatest fluid volume with CW, but fluid status post rehydration was statistically insignificant between all beverages ( p > 0.05). Perceived thirst was significantly greater for FW and CES at 0 minutes of rehydration ( p < 0.05), while saltiness and nausea were insignificantly different between trials ( p > 0.05). This study demonstrated that potassium-rich CW as a natural electrolyte rehydration alternative is equally effective in rehydration and palatability as the commercial CES drink, after moderate-to-high intensity exercise, despite having lower sodium concentrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it