MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417156368 · doi:10.33989/2226-4078.2025.1.09

The study of the psychological health of Ukrainian educators during the russian-Ukrainian War

2025· article· W4417156368 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nadiia Pavlyk

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychology and Personality · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Social Development in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological healthMental healthUkrainianPsychological well-beingPsychological testingAggressionQuarter (Canadian coin)Empirical research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under wartime conditions, Ukraine faced a critical decline in the psychological well-being of its citizens. Anxiety, fear, depression, and aggression were identified as indicators of a deteriorated psychological state. This trend also affected the educational community, whose members were expected to remain calm and bear responsibility for children. The aim of the article was to present the results of an empirical study examining the psychological health of educators of various age groups working during wartime. Empirical data analysis methods were employed, including psychodiagnostic testing, statistical averaging, and percentage ratio analysis. The article introduced a model of psychological health consisting of spiritual-meaningful, social, mental, and psychosomatic components, the development level of which determined overall psychological health status. The study revealed that one-third of respondents (37.4%) demonstrated a high level of psychological health; one quarter (27.5%) showed an above-average level; while 17.6% exhibited a below-average psychological condition. A relatively high proportion (17.6%) of educators were found to have a low level of psychological health, negatively affecting their professional performance. Specific manifestations of psychological health across different age groups were identified. Educators aged 19-24 demonstrated the lowest psychological well-being, hindering their professional self-fulfilment during wartime. Those aged 25-39 showed adaptive resilience, with good psychological health enabling productive work. The psychological health of educators aged 40-66 was generally above average and remained relatively stable despite the war. It was established that higher-order psychological health components (spiritual-meaningful and social) were sufficiently developed among modern educators, while the most vulnerable components were the psychosomatic and particularly the mental ones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.397 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychology and PersonalitySame topicEducation and Social Development in UkraineFrench-language works237,207