MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417158748 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.11.855

Condition Monitoring of Worm Gears under periodic loading conditions

2025· article· en· W4417158748 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew E. Bondoc, Johannes Gründer, Johannes Frank, Ahmad Barari, Alexander Monz

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersDeutscher Akademischer AustauschdienstUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology
KeywordsCondition monitoringDeformation monitoringContinuous monitoringBoundary value problem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In many production and assembly applications, conveyor belts are used to move components and materials. Those systems are usually operated by electrical motors in combination with a gearbox. To prevent downtimes of the production lines, condition monitoring is increasingly being used to predict failures of the systems components, for example in the drive train. This research aims to develop a method for detecting pitting in worm gearboxes as an indicator of failure in such applications by carrying out a modal analysis of the worm gear components and experimental investigation of an industrial worm gearbox with undamaged and damaged worm wheel by vibration measurement using an acceleration sensor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicGear and Bearing Dynamics AnalysisFrench-language works237,207