MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417159820 · doi:10.18845/rc.v34i2.8369

Poemas de Adriano de San Martín

2025· article· W4417159820 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adriano Corrales Arias

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Comunicación · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicVisual Culture and Art Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)Sequence (biology)Archipelago

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los poemas que se presentan son una muestra, seleccionada por el autor, de sus últimos cinco libros publicados, a saber: Vanitas, Vigilia, Secuencias, Elegías de labrador y Gin Tonic. Los dos primeros fueron escritos durante la pandemia del Covid-19 y pueden leerse como un testimonio de la angustia y dolor generados durante ese aciago período. El tercero es un texto que se adentra en la crisis de la posmodernidad y de sus discursos con un lenguaje disruptivo cercano al cinematográfico. Y los dos últimos, como sus nombres lo sugieren, son poemarios elegíacos sobre la “noche oscura del alma”, cuando el amor se rompe o no es suficiente para los amantes o para la humanidad en general.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista ComunicaciónSame topicVisual Culture and Art TheoryFrench-language works237,207