MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417164449 · doi:10.1080/23744731.2025.2593799

Grey-box models of chiller evaporator for practical integration in building automation systems

2025· article· en· W4417164449 on OpenAlexaff
Hongwen Dou, Kun Zhang, Radu Zmeureanu

Bibliographic record

VenueScience and Technology for the Built Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChillerEvaporatorWater chillerChiller boiler systemBuilding automationAutomationSystem integration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the development and validation of grey-box models for estimating the chilled water temperature difference ΔTchw across the chiller evaporator, with potential applications as virtual sensors in building automation systems (BAS) or integration into other mathematical models. The models are established for two scenarios, variable and constant chilled water flow rates under quasi-steady-state operation. These models require a small number of input variables and are characterized by strong adaptability. Three case studies of different chillers are used to validate the proposed virtual sensors with both static and dynamic windows methods, and help in the generalization of the proposed method. The models demonstrate high accuracy and robustness, achieving a root-mean-squared error of 0.19 °C in one case study. This study addresses the gap in the availability of simple yet reliable models that can be practically integrated into building automation systems for virtual sensing, virtual calibration, fault detection and diagnosis, and HVAC system control and optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience and Technology for the Built EnvironmentSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207