MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417166008 · doi:10.1177/00220094251401604

Colonial and Imperial Legacies, National Transformations: Jewish Minorities in 1950s to 1970s Morocco and Turkey

2025· article· en· W4417166008 on OpenAlexafffund
Övgü Ülgen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Contemporary History · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTurkey's Politics and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité Laval
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture
KeywordsJudaismEmigrationPoliticsIdentity (music)ColonialismDecolonizationTurkish

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the experiences of Jewish minorities in Morocco and Turkey and examines how these experiences shaped patterns of identification within postcolonial and post-Ottoman contexts. While Jews from the Middle East and North Africa have been widely studied, comparative research across groups remains limited. Drawing on life-story interviews, comparative historical analysis, and secondary sources, the study highlights variations in minority strategies, identity negotiation, and political adaptation. The findings reveal that Moroccan Jewish identity was shaped by geographical distinctions and the Israel–Palestine conflict, which heightened feelings of alienation, whereas Turkish Jews navigated the norms of kayadez and experienced neither decolonization pressures nor large-scale emigration during the same period. Social class and educational differences further influenced individual experiences, illustrating the nuanced ways participants adapted to socio-historical and political challenges. By comparing these populations, the article sheds light on the diverse strategies of survival, negotiation, and identity formation employed by minority groups in response to the postcolonial and post-Ottoman nation-building and political transformations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.520
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Contemporary HistorySame topicTurkey's Politics and SocietyFrench-language works237,207