Perspectives and Beliefs Surrounding Postpartum Care and Physical Activity of South Asian Immigrant Women in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Beginning or returning to physical activity is an important element of postpartum care due to its associated mental and physical health benefits. South Asian immigrant women often report a lack of confidence in physical activity engagement and may face cultural barriers to engagement. The purpose of this study was to explore South Asian immigrant women's perspectives and beliefs surrounding postpartum care and physical activity in Canada. Method Eleven South Asian immigrant women ( M age = 31) who had given birth in Canada within the last 12 months and were able to understand and speak English or Punjabi, participated in the study. A semi-structured interview was used to explore participants’ birth and postpartum healthcare experiences, as well as their physical activity engagement. Audio-recorded interviews were directly translated and transcribed from Punjabi to English and a reflexive thematic analysis approach was applied. Results Through our analysis, we developed four themes: (a) conflicting traditional and modernized beliefs around postpartum care; (b) physical activity was important to care for one's child and the home, but perceptions of what constituted physical activity varied; (c) lack of time, lack of knowledge, a physically weak body, and exhaustion were barriers to physical activity engagement; and (d) social support was crucial in improving well-being and reducing feelings of isolation, particularly for those with live-in family. Conclusion Given the high appreciation for community programming which support South Asian mothers, it is essential that culturally relevant physical activity be incorporated into healthcare education postpartum to increase knowledge around health benefits of physical activity. In addition, South Asian immigrant women may require community engagement (including programming) and informational support from healthcare providers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".