MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Toward the Decarbonization of Maritime Supply Chains: A Ship Emissions Prediction Framework

2025· article· W4417169903 on OpenAlexaffabout
Abdelhak El aissi, Ismail Bourzak, Loubna Benabbou, Abdelaziz Berrado

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMaritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouse gasWork (physics)Sustainable developmentIdentification (biology)Component (thermodynamics)Climate changeAir pollutantsGlobal warming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maritime transport is a vital component of international trade, yet the industry contributes substantially to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with carbon dioxide <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(\text{CO}_{2})$</tex> as the predominant emission, in addition to various air pollutants incuding NOx, SOx, CO, PM, and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\text{CH}_{4}$</tex>. These emissions pose serious risks to both the environment and public health. As the International Maritime Organization (IMO) establishes ambitious decarbonization objectives, the development of reliable methods to quantify and predict ship emissions has become increasingly important. This work introduces a data-driven methodology that combines Automatic Identification System (AIS) records, vessel characteristics, and meteorological parameters. Using advanced machine learning algorithms, the framework estimates emissions at the individual ship level and generates a dynamic emissions inventory. The proposed approach provides actionable insights to support emission monitoring, environmental assessment, and policy development. Moreover, the methodology can be adapted to other Canadian waterways and international contexts, offering a pathway toward more sustainable and low-carbon maritime transport.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMaritime Transport Emissions and EfficiencyFrench-language works237,207