MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417178561 · doi:10.3748/wjg.v31.i46.112010

Beyond the skin - metastatic basal cell carcinoma in the stomach: A case report

2025· article· en· W4417178561 on OpenAlexaff
Shukria Ahmadi, Ishraq Joarder, Fahd Jowhari

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusKelowna General HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasal cell carcinomaMetastasisCarcinomaMEDLINEImmunohistochemistryMultidisciplinary approach

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most prevalent skin cancer, characterized by indolent growth and low metastatic rates. When metastatic BCC (mBCC) does occur, it most commonly involves lymph nodes, lungs, and bones, with metastases to other sites being exceptionally rare. This case reports the first documented instance of mBCC to the stomach, highlighting the importance of considering atypical metastatic sites, and the challenges associated with diagnosis and management. CASE SUMMARY: A 52-year-old male with recurrent BCC and known mBCC to the bone presented with progressive dysphagia, cranial neuropathies and generalized weakness. He had been treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, with intermittent therapy modifications due to treatment related toxicities. His past history was notable for malignant perineural invasion, radiotherapy for osseous metastases, immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced enteritis, and osteonecrosis of the jaw. Gastroscopy revealed subepithelial gastric lesions, and biopsies confirmed mBCC - a previously unreported site of disease dissemination. A multidisciplinary team involving gastroenterology, oncology, neurology, and palliative care guided his management. Given his declining functional status and poor prognosis, he was ultimately transitioned to hospice care. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should consider atypical metastatic sites in advanced BCC. A multidisciplinary approach remains essential for timely diagnosis and coordinated management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of GastroenterologySame topicCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207