MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417183847 · doi:10.1002/jeo2.70589

Shoulder dislocations in professional male football (soccer) do not negatively affect long‐term quantitative and qualitative performance parameters: A retrospective analysis of 30 in‐match injuries of the German Bundesliga

2025· article· en· W4417183847 on OpenAlex
Blanca Julie Degener, Christoph Theil, Georg Gosheger, Patrick May, J.J. SEIDEL, Tim Schachtrup, Theodoros Zafeiris, Kristian Nikolaus Schneider

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanFootballAffect (linguistics)Qualitative researchSports medicineFootball playersAthletes

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose Shoulder dislocations in professional football are increasing and regularly associated with substantial layoff times. However, research on players' postinjury performance remains limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate whether first‐time shoulder dislocations negatively affect performance after return to play (RTP) and to determine whether the type of treatment (nonoperative vs. operative) influences post‐injury performance outcomes. Methods Retrospective, media‐based analysis of all first‐time in‐match shoulder dislocations in the top two German football leagues (first and second Bundesliga) from the 2012/2013 to 2021/2022 season ( n = 30). Quantitative and qualitative performance data, as well as player‐, match‐ and injury‐related data were obtained from official databases. The Goalimpact (Goalimpact GmbH), a numerical value representing an individual player's impact on team success, served as the qualitative parameter. Data were analysed up to 2 years pre‐injury and 2 years post‐RTP. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results A total of 30 shoulder dislocations in 30 players with a median age of 25 years (Interquartile range [IQR]: 23–26) were available for analysis. Median layoff time was 65 days (IQR: 23–115), 22 days (IQR: 10–34) for those treated conservatively and 112 days (IQR: 92–133; p < 0.001) for players undergoing surgery. Quantitative performance parameters showed a temporary decrease, with fewer matches ( p = 0.017) and minutes played ( p = 0.004) in the 10 matches following RTP compared to the 10 matches pre‐injury. Goalimpact values were initially comparable to pre‐injury levels but improved 1 year (131 [IQR: 115–150] vs. 141 [IQR: 122–160]; p = 0.001) and 2 years (127 [IQR: 107–153] vs. 139 [IQR: 124–161]; p < 0.001) after RTP compared to pre‐injury. No significant differences in performance were found regarding type of injury or type of treatment, nor were performance outcomes statistically significantly influenced by player's age, league and position played. Conclusion Shoulder dislocations in professional football led to a temporary short‐term decrease in quantitative performance parameters, while qualitative performance parameters remained initially similar. Type of injury as well as type of treatment, player's age, league and position played did not significantly influence performance outcomes. Level of Evidence Level III.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.381 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it