Դրվագներ բրիտանական և հայկական բարեգործական կազմակերպությունների համագործակցության պատմությունից (1915-1917թթ)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During World War I, approximately 300,000 Western Armenians, having escaped genocide, found refuge in Armenian-populated areas of the Caucasus. Great Britain played an important role in receiving them and providing them with basic living conditions. The purpose of this article is to present the history of the charitable activities of the British organizations “Armenian Red Cross and Refugee Fund” and “Armenian Refugee Fund (Lord Mayor's Fund)”. These organizations, through donations from the United Kingdom and funds from the British treasury, saved thousands of people from starvation, disease, and physical destruction. Methods and materials: To create a comprehensive picture of the activities carried out by British and Armenian charitable organizations in 1915-1917, the article uses methods such as qualitative classification of primary sources, comparison of handwritten and printed documents, verification of their authenticity, as well as analysis and comparison of historical facts. Analysis: By comparing documents stored in the relevant funds of the National Archives of Armenia, Armenian-language scientific literature, and materials published in the periodicals of that time, the article presents the main directions and results of the activities of these organizations, as well as their connections with Armenian charitable foundations operating in the region. Results: Working with Armenian charities operating in the Caucasus, British charities provided significant assistance to Armenian refugees by establishing children's shelters, workshops, canteens, and hospitals. After the end of the World War, when Turkish troops were withdrawn from the territory of the newly formed Republic of Armenia, many of these organizations returned and continued their activities until 1926. Authors’ contributions: The research was carried out with the direct participation of both authors: the first author prepared the history of the activities of the “Armenian Red Cross and Refugee Fund” for publication, while the second author prepared the history of the activities of the “Armenian Refugee Fund (Lord Mayor's Fund)” in 1915–1917.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".