MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417195612 · doi:10.4138/atlgeo.2025.024

The Dry River Diorite: insights into mantle contributions to the younger White Mountain Magma Series, New Hampshire, USA

2025· article· en· W4417195612 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael J. Dorais, Sean Kinney, Francisco E. Apen, Elizabeth Niespolo

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantic Geoscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesBrigham Young University
KeywordsDioriteMaficFelsicBatholithMagmatismBasaltZirconGeosyncline

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Dry River Diorite is one of the few mafic bodies spatially associated with the White Mountain Batholith of New Hampshire, USA. However, new U–Pb zircon geochronology reveals a 119.92 ± 0.62 Ma emplacement age for the diorite, considerably younger than the ca. 200–180 Ma batholith and indicates that it is instead a member of the younger White Mountain Magma Series (ca. 130–100 Ma) of the New England–Quebec province. The diorite is mildly silica undersaturated, with chondrite-normalized REE and spider diagram patterns that indicate ocean island basalt compositions. Several tectonic discrimination diagrams indicate the magmas have within-plate basaltic compositions. Ce/Yb versus La/Ta and Sm/Yb versus La/Sm values indicate the magmas are 2–5% partial melts of garnet peridotites. ƐNd and initial 87Sr/86Sr values range between 4.27 to 3.44 and 0.7036 to 0.7040 respectively. All these geochemical characteristics are identical to those of the mafic rocks of eastern Monteregian Hills and the Ossipee complex basalts of central New Hampshire. Modeling of the Dry River Diorite as the mafic endmember of the felsic rocks of the younger White Mountain Magma Series indicates that the felsic rocks contain up to 50% crustal endmember. Previous high-precision geochronological studies indicated a relatively brief period of magmatism across this region and have argued that observed age progressions of continental magmatism are consistent with the Great Meteor Hotspot hypothesis for their formation. The age produce here for the Dry River Diorite is consistent with this trend’ however, the younger-than-predicted age is likely the result of Pb-loss or complex geological factors. Although the Cretaceous magmatic rocks in this region do not easily fit a linear age progression as a simple hotspot model might predict, the confluence of geodynamic processes that have shaped this region over 200 myr are not simple and require a high standard of verification for any one hypothesis. Whether these magmas resulted from complex hotspot dynamics, asthenospheric upwelling, or some other mechanism or combination of mechanisms requires a clear path to deconvolve the role each process had in shaping the magmatic history we can now observe. The new geochronologic data we present is consistent with other ca. 120 Ma, geographically proximal plutons in the region and therefore consistent with the age progression a hot spot model would predict for a large fraction of the Cretaceous magmatism observed across the region; however this does not preclude other models, e.g., edge-driven convection, for parsimoniously explaining magmatism in the region that does not conform to this track.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtlantic GeoscienceSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207