Design, Analysis, and Prototyping of a Multifunctional Digital Twin-Enabled Aerospace Drilling End-Effector Deployable by a Collaborative Robot
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drilling in aerospace one-up assembly demands high positional accuracy, strong clamping forces, and precise angular compensation to ensure quality in multi-layered stacks. Existing robotic solutions achieve these requirements but are costly, bulky, and unsuitable for flexible or collaborative environments. This work introduces the Advanced Collaborative Multifunctional End-Effector (ACME), a lightweight robotic drilling end-effector designed for integration with collaborative robots (cobots). ACME incorporates vacuum-assisted clamping capable of generating high forces, a passive self-normalization mechanism for angular alignment on double-curvature surfaces, and a compact 5-DoF positioning system for precise positioning and orientation. The system's kinematics and dynamics were modeled and experimentally verified through frequency response function (FRF) testing, enabling precise behavior prediction. The tool is integrated within a cyber-physical system (CPS) featuring an interactive digital twin that, unlike passive monitoring systems, allows operators to configure workpieces, select drilling locations directly from rendered CAD, and supervise execution without programming expertise. Experiments demonstrated average positional errors of 0.19 mm and normality deviations of 0.29°, both within aerospace standards. The results confirm that ACME effectively extends cobot capabilities for aerospace-grade drilling while improving flexibility, safety, and operator accessibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".